Founder Editor in Chief: Octavian-Dragomir Jora ISSN (print) 2537 - 2610
,
ISSN (online) 2558 - 8206
Contact Editorial Team RAFPEC The Idea
Mainstreaming Nationalism?

Mainstreaming Nationalism? The Case of the Law and Justice Party (PiS)

No. 1, Sep.-Oct. 2016 » UNCOVERstory

Most of the political parties in Europe face significant existential crises in terms of their weakening organisations, the narrowing public policy space, and their electoral support. In contrast, resurging nationalist and extremist parties gather momentum across Europe, benefiting from the growing wave of Euroscepticism. A prominent example of this is the main right-wing political party in Poland — the Law and Justice Party (PiS).

The edges have started to blur between the contentious parties. With the example of PiS we see how a “challenger” is moving towards the mainstream, gaining control of the national government or of a majority of the Parliament over several electoral cycles. This has a twofold significance. Firstly, it is important for us to see how such parties have moved from the periphery of the party system to its mainstream, as they also become noticeable in regional and international affairs. Secondly, it is important to understand their appeal to the electorate, and what are the policy issues they build upon.

Poland is one of the key actors in the European Union project, as well as the broader regional architecture of power. Like its fellow Visegrad group of countries (Poland, Hungary, Czech Republic and Slovakia), the Polish party system has been significantly marked by the rising prominence of nationalist or conservative platforms. The major political actor employing the nationalist platform to rise to power is the the Law and Justice Party (PiS). Its influence surpasses that of its competitors, as it became a benchmark for other parties following the same recipe for survival (e.g. Czech Social Democratic Party (CSSD) led by Milos Zeman – Czech Republic, or Direction - Social Democracy (SMER-SD) led by Robert Fico - Slovakia). Still, the most striking similarity both in terms of party platform and in terms of the leadership figure is with Hungarian FIDESZ. In support of this, we find an increase in joint statements and common stances on the part of Jaroslaw Kaczynski (PiS) and Viktor Orban (FIDESZ).

The prospect of a consolidated nationalist platform in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) was not perceived as likely throughout the past decade, since the main competitor of PiS, the Civic Platform (PO) had proven to be highly successful in domestic elections. It also developed a strong presence at the EU level, with former Prime Minister Donald Tusk becoming the President of the European Council in 2014. The puzzle is to address how nationalist and Eurosceptic parties like the Law and Justice Party (PiS) have managed to rise to prominence, being powerful competitors in their domestic political scene.

The Law and Justice Party (PiS) was formed in 2001, as a splinter of the Solidarity Electoral Action (AWS) political platform. Political analyses suggest it capitalized on “the rapidly rising popularity of Lech Kaczyncki, who as Minister of Justice (June 2000-July 2001), was outspoken in his advocacy on tough measures against violent crime and corruption” (Jasiewicz and Jasiewicz-Betkiewicz, 2002). Its association with smaller nationalist and populist parties in Poland (e.g. League of Polish Families, Self Defense of the Republic of Poland) led to it becoming both an effective competitor on the national arena, as well as one of the biggest conservative forces within the European Parliament.

Table 1. Relative Positioning of PiS on Contentious Issues

European Integration
LPRLeague of Polish Families7.9285712
SRPSelf Defence of the Republic of Poland6.3333335
PiSLaw and Justice6.1428571
PSLPolish Peoples Party4.7857141
POCivic Platform3.5
SLDDemocratic Left Alliance3.0714285
[1] Party supports further political integration of the European Union and Poland's leadership in that process.
[10] Party sees European political integration as having gone too far and advocates Poland's leadership in reversing that process.
Role of the Church
LPRLeague of Polish Families9.2142859
PiSLaw and Justice8.0714283
PSLPolish Peoples Party6.4166665
POCivic Platform5.4285712
SRPSelf Defence of the Republic of Poland5.0999999
SLDDemocratic Left Alliance2.2857144
[1] Party supports the position that church should be completely separated from the state and should not interfere with politics.
[10] Party supports the position that Church should exert influence over politics and state policies.
Communist Past
SLDDemocratic Left Alliance8.9285717
SRPSelf Defence of the Republic of Poland6.7777777
PSLPolish Peoples Party6.0833335
POCivic Platform4.0769229
LPRLeague of Polish Families1.7142857
PiSLaw and Justice1.2857143
[1] Party supports the position that individuals who were occupying high positions under the communist regime (“nomenclatura”), and also communist’s security service agents should be now forbidden to occupy responsible state functions.
[10] Party supports the position that it is of no interest what people who occupy public positions were doing during communism times – it is important what these people are doing now.

Source: Democratic Accountability and Linkages Project (DALP) 2008-2009 Dataset.

If we account for the relative positioning of PiS within the Polish party system (Table 1) on some of the main contemporary contentious issues today, we find it sooner settled towards the mean rather than the extreme. With regards to European Integration we find from the DALP expert survey data that PiS public discourse conforms to a policy stance that is more critical of the integration process than in favour of further integration. Still, both LPR and SRP are more Eurosceptic than PiS. With regards to the Church, we find the party system heavily polarised, with PiS and LPR fervently in favour of an enhanced role of the Church, and the successor SLD strongly supporting a complete separation. Finally, both the PiS and the League of Polish Families (LPR) have built their political identity on hostility towards communism and the Polish successor party, the Democratic Left Alliance. Nevertheless, PiS has not shied away from capitalising on the leftist niche, by promoting a resonant policy agenda (see Table 1).

According to some researchers (Smolnar in Pankowski and Kormak 2013, 162) the vision of the PiS leadership is “hierarchical, [revolving around] the nation, community, patriotism, traditionally-interpreted values, state paternalism, and social solidarity”. The ideology of the party is characterized as “national-conservative populism”, although in 2007 and 2011 a number of activists known for their far right views were absorbed and moderated by the party, and the party continued to collaborate and form a strategic alliance with Radio Maryja, a religious Polish radio station (Pankowski and Kormak 2013, 162).

The recurrent themes of the programs over the years were those related to the fight against corruption, a strong state direction in regard to economic and social policies; as well as nation and family values as core values. The party did not include references to the Christian democratic principles in its program, but after 2001 they have embraced the Catholic value orientation. In Table 2 we have synthetized some of the core economic and political orientation, social and value orientation, from 2001 to 2014.

Table 2. Main Values of the PiS Electoral Programs (2001-2015)

2001 Parliamentary elections
Economic orientationSocial orientationValue orientationPolitical orientation
Strong state direction
Constitutional change of roles of National Bank and Monetary Council
Polish economy is corrupted by pathological relationing
Lower taxes
Protection of domestic market
Accept higher budget deficit 
Active social policy
Education, employment, culture
Housing credits and new construction fund
Recentralize health services
Stronger environmental protection 
Nation and family are central values
New moral order
Oppose primitive liberalism and vulgar pragmatism
Cleansing of political elite to “repair the state”
Anti-corruption Bureau
Transition period of summary justice
Reform security services
New penal code; cost-benefit analysis of EU membership
2005 Parliamentary elections
Economic orientationSocial orientationValue orientationPolitical orientation
Strong state direction
Protection of domestic market
Keep enterprises important for economic security in state hands
Unemployment – tax and social security reductions for job creations, training programs
Improving the absorption of EU funds
Independent National Bank 
Increase benefits for families, elder people
Pro-family
3 million new homes in 8 years
Nation and family are central values
Strict abortion rules
No civil partnerships
Establish a new social contract
No euthanasia, no in-vitro fertilization 
Enhance the powers
Increased presidential powers
Lustration (Truth and Justice Commission); open files of all public officials
Reveal all functionaries and collaborators; property lustration of politicians and families
Corruption – Anti-Corruption Bureau; remove old guard from security services
New elite body within Prosecution Office
Civilian control of police 
2007 Parliamentary elections
Economic orientationSocial orientationValue orientationPolitical orientation
Keep the economy healthy
Issue of Poles working abroad
Keep enterprises important for economic security in state hands
Improving the absorption of EU funds
Pro-family
Active social policy
Education and culture
Nation and family are central values
Strict abortion rules
No civil partnerships
No euthanasia
No in vitro fertilization
Anti-corruption agency
Dissolve the network of business oligarchs, politicians, and the security services that formed the webs of corruption
Control of all institutions that threatened the IV Republic project (i.e. the public media and the judiciary)
Breaking the power of the “corporate monopolies”, law, journalism, and medicine
Defend national interests in foreign policy
2011 Parliamentary elections
Economic orientationSocial orientationValue orientationPolitical orientation
Strong state direction
Protection of domestic market
Keep the sustainable economic development
Privatization of small companies
Tax deductions
Improving absorption of EU funds
Pro-family
Decent retirement for the elderly
Active social policy
Stress on education and culture
Affordable housing
Nation and family are central values
Strict abortion rules
No civil partnerships
No euthanasia
No in vitro fertilization
Anti-corruption
Lustration
Protection against the abuse of the EU institution and bureaucratization 
2015 Parliamentary elections
Economic orientationSocial orientationValue orientationPolitical orientation
Strong state direction
Limit the power of private corporations
Preservation of national currency
Reconstructing the tax system
Improve the absorption of EU funds
Investment fund companies
by state-owned companies
Pro-family
Unemployment issues
Affordable housing
Increase family policy
Healthcare
Subsidies for farmers
Nation and family are central values
Strict abortion rules
No civil partnerships
No euthanasia
No in vitro fertilization
Tradition
Anti-corruption
Strengthening border control
Improve national security
Improve the judicial system
“Euro-realism”
Control over national media

Source: Compiled by the authors based on Millard 2010.

The table above highlights key aspects of the PiS electoral programs over the last 15 years, by grouping the economic, social political and value-oriented approaches in order to portray the manner in which it has ideologically revolved around gender and European issues. PiS’s core values have remained similar over the years: the statist-economic approach has been related to the political approaches to corruption and the fight against the “układ” – business oligarchs that have established dominant economic relations after 1989 in Poland (Millard 2010, 147-8); protection of the domestic market and keeping control of key enterprises. These approaches have changed with regards to issues of globalization and Europeanization (such as stepping back on issues incompatible with EU positions like the death penalty; retaining the independence of the National Bank or limiting the powers of corporations). PiS has raised numerous political controversies, with its approaches on lustration, the public media and judiciary system; or the European Union (by referring to Euro-realism - economic cooperation, but independence over policies).

The social orientation has revolved around the importance of the family and especially on family policies (e.g. Family 500+ program), as well as on housing and unemployment issues, health and education, turning to agriculture in the last years. Its value orientation on nation and family has been in conflict with liberal values that support women’s sexual and reproductive rights, LGBTQ rights, and assisted suicide and have placed importance to tradition linked to Christianity and the Polish national identity.

In order to better grasp these approaches, we have turned to the PiS 2014 electoral program for the 2015 Parliamentary elections. Using content analysis we coded paragraphs in which the following codes were present: EU, European, family, tradition/culture, PO (Civic Platform)—led by Donald Tusk, nation/nationalism as well as the Catholic Church. Our findings show that through framing, PiS have identified PO (or the “Tusk system”) as the source of the main economic and political problems in Poland, with the support of the media and the secret service; and the European Union’s liberalism as the cultural and social crisis trigger, through its gender ideology and values. According to our research, PiS attributed to these two actors, to the proportion of 27.9% (PO) and 25.5% (EU), the de-construction of the national consciousness and family values (30,4%) that affect all Poles.

Figure 1. Frequency of the Coded Themes

Figure 1. Frequency of the Coded Themes
Source: the authors

Our findings suggest that the PiS leadership embraces Euro-realism. National sovereignty of the state is preferred in order to build a strong economic position of the country in the international arena. It is considered that the position of Poland in the EU arena is peripheral and passive and it should be strengthened to become a subjective, independent co-decision maker. The membership in the European Union and the North Atlantic Alliance is treated as a tool for implementing Polish national interests and not as an end in itself, but as a means to enhance Polish status and interests.

Moreover, the educational reforms made before the EU accession and over the years have brought the educational system into a crisis and must be fundamentally changed into a system of shared knowledge, common symbols, references, ideas of Polish identity and national experience. This is a key-approach that shows how the members of the party use framing and argumentation to address the symbolic construction of the external reality, by blaming concrete actors, punctuating injustices in social conditions and actions that are needed to generate change (Snow, Benford 1992; Kluknavská 2014). We have thus framed a systematic analysis of the PiS electoral program and have identified what are the main problems, to whom they are attributed, who are the people affected by them and the solutions that PiS have given to these problems.

Figure 2. Diagnosis Frame of the PiS Electoral Program

Figure 2. Diagnosis Frame of the PiS Electoral Program
Sources: the authors
 
PRINT EDITION

SUBSCRIPTION

FOUNDATIONS
The Romanian-American Foundation for the Promotion of Education and Culture (RAFPEC)
THE NETWORK
WISEWIDEWEB
Amfiteatru Economic

OEconomica No. 1, 2016